One of the best things about our team is that we have six team members to share ideas with, debate, and get a consensus ranking on players. For the third consecutive year, we decided to break the player pool into specific conferences and divisions last season, with each analyst being responsible for the same group. We believe the continuity in that evaluation is helpful and is aided by our team's size to test our evaluations and hypotheses against. All of the incoming freshmen are randomly divided up and dispersed to each team member to evaluate. This article will provide a window into each analyst's minds and processes, and our aim is to better inform the readers about players who had strong feelings about this cycle.
You must be a member to view this content.
If you are not a member, check out our membership plans.
